Imanova Mehriban, кандидат физикоматематических наук
Ibrahimov Vagif, доктор физикоматематических наук, профессор
Бакинский государственный университет, Азербайджан
Участник конференции
UDC 519.62/.642
During consideration of the chronology of scientific works we may note that scientists have studied integrodifferential equations as more comprehensive than differential and integral equations. That is why differential equations are more often at the basis of studies, then integral and integrodifferential equations. As the result, the majority of specialists substitute the solving of integral and integrodifferential equations by solving differential equations. To widen this subject authors have presented the general hybrid method for solution of integrodifferential equations and determination of their equality with to the abovementioned equations. The certain stable hybrid method considered in the article allows to use the point of linkage in the lower limit with splithair accuracy. From the other side at k=1 (with the use of the linkage point) onestep method is used, when p=6.
Keywords: nonlinear integrodifferential equations, hybrid method, ordinary differential equations, multistep methods, relation between order and degree for hybrid methods.
Consider to solving of the following Volterra integrodifferential equation of first order:
(1)
Suppose that equation (1) has a unique solution defined on the segment [x_{0,}X] and satisfying the following initial condition:
y(x_{0})=y_{0} (2)
To determine the numerical solution of the problem (1)  (2) assume that the continuous on totality of arguments, functions ƒ(x.y) and K(x,s,y) defined in the domains
respectively, and also have continuous partial derivatives to up some order p+1, inclusively. The segment [x_{0,}X] with a constant stepsize h>0 is divided into N equal parts and mesh points define in the form:x_{i}=x_{0}+ih (i=0,1,...N).
To calculate the approximate values ??of the solution problem (1)  (2) used certain formulas for, which are denoted by y an approximate, but through y(x_{i}) the exact value of the solution of problem (1)  (2) at the mesh points x_{i}=x_{0}+ih (i=0,1,...N).
Beginning with V.Volterra^{, }s work (see[1]), published in 1887 to present time, scientists engage for the investigation of approximate solutions of problem (1)  (2), constructed methods for the solving of equation (1) (see, for example[2][7].). But construct an effective method satisfying certain requirements is one of the based questions of modern computational mathematics. Therefore, scientists are often turning to the construction of numerical methods for the solving of problem (1)  (2), which has some additional properties. One of such methods is the hybrid methods, which applying to solve the problem (1)  (2) offer by Makroglou and developed in the works [8][9]. Here be in progress these researches constructed of stable hybrid methods with high accuracy and also constructed the specific methods with a certain accuracy, which are illustrated on the model problems.
In the case ?=0 the equation (1) is converted to a differential equation to the study, which engaged many wellknown scientists: N.Tusi, I.Newton, A.C.Clairaut, G.W.Leibniz, L.Euler, J.L.Lagrange, A.L.Cauchy, J.C.Adams, C.Runge, W.Kutta, etc. For the investigation of numerical solution of ordinary differential equations they was construct numerous methods with different properties. Therefore, for solving integral and integrodifferential equations are often used numerical methods of differential equations. This approach is explained with the present of ordinary differential equation by the ??integral equation of the next from:
(3)
which is obtained from the differential equation by integrating on the segment [x_{0,}X]. If equation (3) rewrite in a more general form:
(4)
then we can receive equation of type (1) from it by differentiation. Given these connections between the equations (1), (3) and (4), here to consider application of the following hybrid method
(5)
to the solving of the problem (1)  (2). Note that the method (5) is applied to the solving of initial value problem for ordinary differential equations of first and second order (see [10][12]), and also to the solving of equation (4). The hybrid method used by Makroglou to solve the problem (1)  (2), may be received from the method (5) in particularly for
1. Application of hybrid methods to solving Volterra integrodifferential equations.
As is known, one of the first numerical methods for solving equation (1) is constructed and investigated by V.Volterra. For this purpose, Volterra used the method of quadratures, is consisted in a replacement an integral by some integral sum, which in one variant has the following form:
(6)
here the quantities a_{i}=(i=0,1,2...N) are the real numbers, but R_{n}is the remainder term. If to the solving of the problem (1)  (2) apply kstep method with constant coefficients and taking into account the method of quadratures defined by the formula (6), then we have:
(7)
Here, are the coefficients make up coefficients of the quadrature formula, and coefficients of kstep method, but ?_{i}?_{i}(i=0,1...k) the coefficients of the kstep method. It is easy to remark that the while crossing from the current mesh point to the next amount of computational work is increased, since the second sum in method (7) depends on the variable n. For the relieve from these lack in [9]for solving of the equation (4) proposed the following method:
(8)
Note that depending on the properties of the integral kernel some of the coefficients , will be equal to zero. If suppose that, the kernel of the integral is defined in the ?expansion of domains G then the method (8) can be applied to the solving of equation (4). Otherwise, the coefficients must satisfy the condition. Note that for using of the method (8) must be known quantities y_{0},y_{1},...y_{k1}.By the method (8) one can calculate the values ??of variables y_{n+k}. It is known that usually for solving problem (1)  (2) uses stable methods, but among the stable multistep methods the implicit methods are the most popular. However, when using them are meet with finding solutions of nonlinear equations, which is not always succeed. Usually in such cases, experts use iterative methods, or methods of predictiorcorrectior. It is easy to show that the predictiorcorrectior methods in particular, may also receive from the iterative methods. But to relieve of these shortcomings of implicit methods here is proposed to use the explicit hybrid methods. Therefore, we consider hybrid methods, and their applications to the solving of the integrodifferential equations. Hybrid methods can be constructed by different ways. In the work [9] consider the following hybrid method with constant coefficients:
(9)
For the v_{i}=0 (i=0,1,2....k) from the formula (9) follows a wellknown multistep methods with constant coefficients. Here we consider the case when there is . Usually, in the concrete methods with the maximum degree the quantity v_{k} satisfies the condition 1<v_{k}<0. However, in this case we obtain explicit hybrid methods. For example, from the method (9) receive the next hybrid method with the maximum degree for k=1:
(10)
As the remark above explicit method (10) is obtained from equation (9) for k=1 and have order accuracy p=4. This method is unique in a class methods which has the degree of accuracy p=4. For the construction of hybrid implicit methods, consider the following generalization of the method (9):
(11)
Obviously, if ?_{k}, and 1<v_{k}<0 thenthe method (11) is implicit. Appling implicit methods to solve scientific and engineering problems has some difficulties. Therefore, usually for the construction of concrete methods considered the case ?_{k}=0. Now consider the applications of the method (11) to the solving of problem (1)  (2). To this end, consider the following difference:
(12)
here .
It is obvious that from the equality (4), one can be write the following:
(13)
Here we replace x by the ?_{n} i.e x=?_{n}. Then we have:
If taking into account obtained in (12), then receive the following:
(14)
As is well known to the calculation of the integral one can apply different quadrature formulas as a method of the rectangle formulas and a trapezoid method. However, the method of quadratures can be defined as a linear combination of these methods. Then, generalizing the proposed scheme, we can write:
(15)
If we take vi=1/2 (i=0,1,2...n) then after choosing the suitable coefficients from (15) we obtain a linear combination of generalized methods of the rectangle formulas and trapezoids (see, for example, [13, p184186]. Similar schemes for the solving of ordinary differential equations are used by many authors (see, for example [14],[15]). Replacing the derivatives of functions by its values ??at different mesh points, applying interpolation polynomials Lagrange to calculation quantity . By using them and formula (15) in equality (14) one obtains the following formula:
(16)
The coefficients _{} are some real numbers, but _{}.
Consider the determination of the coefficients. For this purpose we consider a special case and put K(x,s,y)≡z(s,y). Then from (16) we have:
(17)
where
(18)
From equations (4) we have:
y'g'=z(x,y)
As is follows from here the method (17) coincides with the method (5).
To determine the coefficients _{ }of the method (17) using the method of undetermined coefficients and in the result receive the following nonlinear system of algebraic equations (see, for example [10]):
(19)
In this system number of equations is equal p+1, and the number of unknowns is equal 4k+4. The quantity k is known, so determining the values ??of the quantity p used the values ??of the quantities k. One can show that between the quantities k and p has the following relation:
p≤4k+2 (20)
For the application of the method (16) to the solving of problem (1)  (2), the problem (1)(2) rewrite in the following form:
Then the method (16) is apply to the solving of equation (22), and to solving problem (21) we apply the method (5) and choose the coefficients so that the coefficients in these methods coincides by the taking into account conditions (18).Note that if the method (5) is converges, then its coefficients satisfies the following conditions:
A: The coefficients _{} are some real numbers, moreover, _{} .
B: Characteristic polynomials
_{}
have no common multipliers different from the constant.
C: _{}
Consider the construction of specific methods and put k=2. Then for the determining of the coefficients we obtain the following system of nonlinear equations:
(23)
By solving these system, we find the values ??of the coefficients of the method (5), and the coefficients of the method of the type (16) determined from the system (18). Consequently, if the method of the type (16) has the maximum degree and it^{,}s coefficients are defined by the solution of the system (18), then it will not be unique with the maximum degree, because the system (18) has the solution more than one.
If put ?_{2}=1, ?_{1}=0, ?_{0}=1 in this system, then by solving the received system of nonlinear algebraic equations, we have:
Hence we get the following method:
(24)
Remark, that this method is symmetric (so that v0=v_{2} ). But there is the nun symmetric method with the degree p=9.
It is clear, that for using the method (24), it is necessary to determine the values ??of the quantities y_{n+yo} and y_{n+y2}. To illustrate the above mentioned, consider the case k=1 and put ?_{1}=?_{2}=0. Then by solving the system (23), we obtain _{}By using this solution in the formula (9), one receive the method (10), for using which can be suggested the following algorithm, if is known the value y_{1/2}.
Note that for solving some problems by this algorithm for calculating values ??of the quantity y_{i+3/2} can be used the following method:
To illustrate applying this algorithm to solving problem (1)(2) consider the following examples:
_{}
For solving these problems, we are using above mentioned algorithm. Note that the example 1 is solved in the work [2], the examples 13 are solved in the work [7], the example 3 is solved in the work [3], and the example 4 is solved in the work [3]. Here all the examples solved by the hybrid method (10) and the receive results are putting in table 1 and also to solving some of these problems, here used the trapezoid method and the receive results are putting in the table 2, in which we used the next notation:
Method I  Predictorcorrector method consist is Euler and Trapezoid method applying to solving system consists only of ODE.
Method II  The same predictorcorrector method applying to solving system consists only of the integral equations.
Method III  The same predictorcorrector method applying to solving system consists of ODE and integral equation.
Table 1.
Number of the examples  Value of the variable  Maximal error for the method from [2]  Maximal error for the first method from [7]  Maximal error for the second method from [7]  Maximal error for the method from [3]  Maximal error for the hybrid method (10) 
I h=0.05 II h=1/32 III h=1/8 IV h=1/8  1.0 3.0 2.0 2.0  0.12 E05  0.16 E04
0.86 E05 0.43 E03  0.77 E06
0.16 E05 0.58 E04 
0.18 E06 0.2 E05 0.129 E03  0.11 E05 0.21 E04 0.52 E06 0.2 E04 

 Method I  Method II  Method III 
I h=0.05 II h=1/32 III h=0.05 IV h=1/32  1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0  0.28 E03 0.12 E03 0.19 E03 0.68 E03  0.24 E03 0.33 E03 0.19 E03 0.58 E03  0.52 E04 0.70 E04 0.19 E03 0.58 E03 
References:
Артамонова Елена Николаевна
09 / 23 / 2012  12:19